Implications of an ATBI for Reserve Stewardship
Keith Langdon, Peter White, and Becky Nichols
© 2006 The George Wright Society. All rights reserved. This article was first published in The George Wright Forum, the GWS's journal of parks, protected areas, and cultural sites. For more information, visit www.georgewright.org.
- Above all, perhaps, we should be reminded that our knowledge has a bias towards larger organisms
and we are profoundly ignorant about the vast numbers of species, some of which play vital ecological
roles: metabolic roles in decomposition and nutrient cycling, and regulatory roles in pollination
and trophic interactions. Perhaps it is our ignorance and the sheer wonder of discovery that
has raised enthusiasm for large-scale, taxonomically integrated biological inventories.
- The species we discover will help us understand and defend conservation areas against threats.
In a larger context, biological diversity has a fundamental value to ecological function and
to humans: diversity supports future options in terms of the ability for an ecosystem to evolve
and to adapt to environmental change. Genetic diversity is the basis for evolution and adaptation,
and species diversity underlies the range of functions and responses at an ecosystem level.
- Further, when species loss occurs, it is irreversible because each species is the product of a unique evolutionary history that can never be repeated. Many factors thus underlie the excitement behind All Taxa Biodiversity Inventories (ATBIs) and the increasing interest in carrying them out in national parks and other conservation areas.
Species data
- From the beginning of the Smokies’ ATBI, park staff insisted that we needed four things:
- A comprehensive list of species for each group, with valid names and an understanding of where species fit in taxonomic hierarchies.
- An estimation of each species’ relative abundance. Sampling protocols for some groups (e.g., forest litter organisms) may provide much better abundance measurements than others, but the ability to assign relative abundance is a goal for all species.
- Documentation of specific locality information. Once many points are accumulated, we can then attempt to associate each species with various habitat parameters, thereby allowing creation of a first-iteration distribution map for each taxon.
- Wherever feasible, sample in such a way as to provide information on the life history of
each organism. A beetle collected in a flight intercept trap is a valuable record, but a
beetle collected off of its plant host is a more valuable record, because it then allows
both species and their relationship to be associated in the database.
- From a strictly scientific viewpoint, we are learning a tremendous amount about certain species’ ranges,
habitats, and relationships with other species. Geographic analysis of multiple distributions
can be used for activities such as protecting sensitive sites, locating monitoring activities
at the most cost-efficient locales, properly timing control actions for pest species, displaying
the varying intensities of ecological stressors across landscapes, and many other investigations.
All of these activities are of value to park managers, heralding a new level of more intelligent
stewardship of natural reserves. These data will also give the Smokies a strong foundation for
advanced ecological research well after the ATBI project is completed.
- Discovering exotics. Conducting an ATBI means sampling in every habitat and
bringing in taxonomic experts who have wide experience in many other regions. A number of new
exotics have been discovered this way during the Smokies ATBI, including, but not limited to:
- Red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta x richteri), which are now being controlled but will affect many open-land native species;
- Pear thrips (Taeniothrips inconsequens), a European insect that feeds on many North American trees, but in the last 20 years has devastated sugar maples in New England;
- Giant resin bee (Megachile sculpturalis), which is a primary pollinator of kudzu in its native region in Asia;
- Klamath weed beetles (Chrysolina quadrigemina), which have suppressed introduced St. Johns worts (Hypericum spp.) in the West, but may affect two rare narrow endemics, Hypericum mitchellianum and H. graveolens, in the Park;
- Chinese jumping worms (Amynthas hilgendorfi), which are devouring forest duff in
an area with concentrations of rare plants.
- Each of these ATBI discoveries has resulted in some monitoring, management, or research action. ATBIs will lengthen the list of known species-specific threats by exotics in each reserve, but we are better off finding them in their incipient stage of invasion, rather than later when fewer control options are available.
“Spin-off” science
- No one can predict the number or type of threats that will be faced by a park or reserve in the future. Although not a goal of the inventory, monitoring of biological resources from a well-documented ATBI baseline is not only possible, but is virtually assured in future years as changing circumstances require re-measurements of specific resources. The excellent long-term monitoring program currently being established agency-wide by the National Park Service (Protecting & Restoring) is well conceived, peer reviewed, and necessarily expensive. The biological monitoring components that are quantitatively monitored are therefore a very narrow selection of park “vital signs.” These park “vital signs” usually include at least some species- or population- level monitoring in park units, but expense keeps the number of species and sites monitored very low relative to the number of total species in the park or reserve.
|
![]() Click photo to enlarge. Photo courtesy of Charles Wilder / DLIA. |
- Another example of “spin-off ” science is that over 1,000 species of moths and butterflies in the Smokies have had their mitochondrial DNA sequenced and indexed as part of the ATBI. The other 600 known species of Lepidoptera will be added to this database in the near future. Now the park can identify most larvae, making a number of important and previously impossible ecological studies possible. These include plant host–herbivore studies, pollinator studies, bird diet studies, etc. If researchers writing proposals can come to a protected reserve where these data are available already, the reserve becomes much more attractive, and ATBIs become a springboard for advanced research projects in the future, which in turn will benefit the reserve’s stewardship.
Next steps
- In our “sound bite,” scorecard-oriented society, we usually get asked how many new species we have found, but even if not a single new species or new record would have been found, the discovery of hundreds of thousands of known points for known species would make the ATBI a worthwhile endeavor for stewardship and protection purposes.
| A syrphid fly lands on a turtlehead bloom growing along the Appalachian
Trail between Clingman’s Dome and Newfound Gap.
Click photo to enlarge. |
|
Summary
- Every discovery in an ATBI immediately results in value to stewards of the reserve. Not just species new to science and new records for the reserve, but even new locations for common species help in the development of more accurate phenological, geographic, and ecological data products of those species. These values accrue as the project proceeds to completion with comprehensive public involvement in real scientific discovery, “spin-off ” scientific activities, and a superior understanding of the complex ecological processes that drive and sustain every nature preserve.
|
![]() |
Keith Langdon, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Resource Management and Science Division, 1314 Cherokee Orchard Road, Gatlinburg, Tennessee 37738; keith_langdon@nps.gov.
Peter White, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599; peter.white@unc.edu.
Becky Nichols, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Resource Management and Science Division, 1314 Cherokee Orchard Road, Gatlinburg, Tennessee 37738; becky_nichols@nps.gov.
© 2006 The George Wright Society. All rights reserved. This article was first published in The George Wright Forum, the GWS's journal of parks, protected areas, and cultural sites. For more information, visit www.georgewright.org.





